#10963: Axioms and more functorial constructions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery            |        Owner:  stumpc5
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_info
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  days54             |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Nicolas M. Thiéry  |    Reviewers:  Simon King, Frédéric
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Chapoton
         Branch:                     |  Work issues:  merge with #15801
  public/ticket/10963-doc-           |  once things stabilize
  distributive                       |       Commit:
   Dependencies:  #11224, #8327,     |  268345f966b19589088e9b0dc84f183e4f45f545
  #10193, #12895, #14516, #14722,    |     Stopgaps:
  #13589, #14471, #15069, #15094,    |
  #11688, #13394, #15150, #15506,    |
  #15757, #15759, #15919             |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Replying to [comment:633 pbruin]:
 > That is a very good point; I certainly accept that using either of the
 two words "subcategory" and "supercategory" does not mean that one has to
 admit the other as meaning the exact opposite.

 > If we end up wanting to change the name, we can decide later whether we
 want to do it here or in a new ticket.  There would not be huge amount of
 code to change, but it might still be a bit much for this ticket.

 Your comment just made me realize that we would actually need to
 change some pieces of the code (at least renaming the is_subcategory
 method!), and not just some phrasing in the primer. Thus, since this
 is not directly related to this ticket, this definitely belongs to a
 separate ticket.

 I have created #16183. Please keep up this interesting discussion there!

 Peter: would you mind adding some links back from #16183 to the
 specific comments here, and make a brief summary of the discussion so
 far there?

 Cheers,
                                Nicolas

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10963#comment:636>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to