#16220: Waste of time in iterator_edges 3
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vdelecroix         |        Owner:  vdelecroix
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
      Component:  graph theory       |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  graphs,            |    Merged in:
  datastructure                      |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Vincent Delecroix  |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:  public/16220       |  98286f45fc077f9778708ca3f064a2f5a13853ad
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by vdelecroix):

 Replying to [comment:2 ncohen]:
 > Isn't there a problem if you want to iterate over the edges but stop
 midway ? Isn't it the case that the array is never deallocated ?

 You are right, with a code like
 {{{
 sage: it = build_me_an_edge_iterator()
 sage: it.next()
 sage: del it
 }}}
 we keep an array never deallocated. But what happens for alloc/dealloc
 inside cdef functions?

 A solution would be to implement an iterator in Cython with direct access
 to the `SparseGraph` (doing all proper deallocation in `__dealloc__`). Is
 it worth it?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16220#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to