#16091: A missing obvious case for BIBD
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: positive_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.2
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers: Kannappan Sampath
combinatorics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | e722cb1fea07de2c9d2576c36b359ee4db82fb44
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/ncohen/16091 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by knsam):
Looks good to me. I have considered what I think is a proper review: I got
your remote branch and made it my local branch. Then, I did sage -b,
opening a sage session, I tested out this code and it worked fine. Since
this adds no new documentation, I did not rebuild the documentation. I
hope this sounds fine.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16091#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
