#16224: incorrect translation of Bessel from Maxima?
----------------------------+------------------------
       Reporter:  kcrisman  |        Owner:
           Type:  defect    |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major     |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
      Component:  calculus  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:            |    Merged in:
        Authors:            |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A       |  Work issues:
         Branch:            |       Commit:
   Dependencies:            |     Stopgaps:
----------------------------+------------------------
Description changed by kcrisman:

Old description:

> From [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-support/IgC78rcdO7c
> this sage-suppot thread}:
> {{{
> But other sums are simply wrong.
>
> k = var('k')
> sum(x^(2*k)/factorial(2*k),k,0,oo)
>
> gives
>
> -1/4*sqrt(2)*sqrt(pi)*x^(3/2)
>
> but the answer should be sinh(x).
>
> Hmm.  That shouldn't be happening, though I wouldn't be surprised if it
> didn't turn out as easy as that.
>
> (%i1) load(simplify_sum);
> (%o1) /Users/.../Sage-5.12-OSX-64bit-10.6.app/Contents/Reso\
> urces/sage/local/share/maxima/5.29.1/share/solve_rec/simplify_sum.mac
> (%i3) display2d:false;
>
> (%o3) false
> (%i4) simplify_sum(sum(x^(2*k)/factorial(2*k),k,0,inf));
>
> (%o4) sqrt(%pi)*bessel_i(-1/2,x)*sqrt(x)/sqrt(2)
>
> So I'm not sure why that would happen - maybe because of incorrect Bessel
> simplification?
>
> sage: maxima_calculus('bessel_i(-1/2,x)')
> bessel_i(-1/2,x)
> sage: _._sage_()
> sqrt(2)*sqrt(1/(pi*x))*cosh(x)
>
> That gives cosh(x), which I think is what you meant.
> }}}
> I don't know why this would happen, but presumably it should be possible
> to track down without too much effort.

New description:

 From [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-support/IgC78rcdO7c
 this sage-support thread]:
 {{{
 But other sums are simply wrong.

 k = var('k')
 sum(x^(2*k)/factorial(2*k),k,0,oo)

 gives

 -1/4*sqrt(2)*sqrt(pi)*x^(3/2)

 but the answer should be sinh(x).

 Hmm.  That shouldn't be happening, though I wouldn't be surprised if it
 didn't turn out as easy as that.

 (%i1) load(simplify_sum);
 (%o1) /Users/.../Sage-5.12-OSX-64bit-10.6.app/Contents/Reso\
 urces/sage/local/share/maxima/5.29.1/share/solve_rec/simplify_sum.mac
 (%i3) display2d:false;

 (%o3) false
 (%i4) simplify_sum(sum(x^(2*k)/factorial(2*k),k,0,inf));

 (%o4) sqrt(%pi)*bessel_i(-1/2,x)*sqrt(x)/sqrt(2)

 So I'm not sure why that would happen - maybe because of incorrect Bessel
 simplification?

 sage: maxima_calculus('bessel_i(-1/2,x)')
 bessel_i(-1/2,x)
 sage: _._sage_()
 sqrt(2)*sqrt(1/(pi*x))*cosh(x)

 That gives cosh(x), which I think is what you meant.
 }}}
 I don't know why this would happen, but presumably it should be possible
 to track down without too much effort.

--

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16224#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to