#15593: sqlalchemy and gdmodule should not be standard packages
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ohanar | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: packages: | Resolution:
standard | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: R. Andrew Ohana | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | d701c15354193da3ba02762ca61e6763a74b6b40
u/ohanar/optionalize | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jason):
If I understand the sqlalchemy spkg files correctly, this spkg-install
does nothing more than a standard "python setup.py install". Over the
years, there have been a fair number of such packages, or at least
requests for such packages. How about we make "sage -i" try to "pip
install" a package if it can't find the corresponding spkg? Then
"standard python installs" don't need to be maintained as spkgs, but
people still have a transparent way to install them.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15593#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
