#16261: Default behaviour of AdditiveAbelianGroup(a_tuple)
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.2
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: group | Reviewers:
theory | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | 5d78cfc86f64819c0427941c882015dd2e3df73e
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/ncohen/16261 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Yooooooooo !
> The problem is not quite introduced by this change, but this change does
make the problem a little more visible: Why are you singling out `Z/2Z x
Z/3Z` as a group that can be explicitly represented and not
> `Z^2/ span( [1,1],[-1,5])`, with generators the classes of the standard
basis?
Do I misunderstand your question or are you saying that you would like to
use any base you like instead of (1,0),(0,1), or the smith form ?
I just need this new form for a couple of things I am implementing... But
I am afraid of having to touch these files myself, because I have a good
idea of what I forgot about groups since I began a PhD in graph theory...
and it scares me `:-D`
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16261#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.