#16227: Product construction of Transversal Designs
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.2
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
combinatorics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | 054d2a2ffa441f675594a09b95cf943f41121b4c
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/ncohen/16227 |
Dependencies: |
#15310 |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Hi,
Once you have fix the merge with #15310, here are other problems
- the product is sometimes called the Kronecker product and it should be
mentioned in the doc.
- I do not like the way it works: `wilson_construction` and `TD_product`
have the same purpose, build more examples of TD. But first of all, the
naming scheme are different. Why not TD_wilson_construction? More
importantly, in Wilson construction, you do not have to feed the function
with the TD(k,m), TD(k,m+1), TD(k+1,t) and TD(k,u) but for the product you
have to. From what you started with in Wilson construction, I thought we
would have a function {{{def product(k, n1, n2):}}}.
It might be easier to do the whole review in #15310. I propose to merge
the two tickets and set this one as won't fix.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16227#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
