#16231: Equivalence between OA/TD/MOLS
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  ncohen                 |       Status:  needs_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-6.2
  enhancement            |   Resolution:
       Priority:  major  |    Merged in:
      Component:         |    Reviewers:
  combinatorics          |  Work issues:
       Keywords:         |       Commit:
        Authors:         |  a46446f3b29690aa1245583639bb6b78b3d50dca
  Nathann Cohen          |     Stopgaps:
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  u/ncohen/16231         |
   Dependencies:         |
  #15310, #16227         |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by vdelecroix):

 Hello,

 Remainder: the content of this ticket has been partially discussed in
 #15310 and #16227.

 I assume that the big goal of this ticket is also to find more
 constructions.

 The operation which consists in removing groups is trivial. So instead of
 given a couple (k,n) look for a TD(k,n) it is just more meaningful for a
 given n to have functions which:
 - return the largest k such that Sage knows how to build a TD(k,n) and
 provide it
 - the smallest k such that Sage knows that there does not exist a TD(k,n)
 and provide the Theorem that says so (see also #16272 for that)

 Removing this feature from the MOLS in is '''very''' bad. I would rather
 try to make it available in the other functions. Doing it by "trying all
 `k` before it says no" does not look like a good strategy to me.

 In order to find new TD(k,n), we have different strategies:
 - ''individual constructions'' (currently there is `TD_6_12` and also the
 ones introduced in #16241 #16236 and #16235)
 - ''family constructions'' (these are currently included into
 `orthogonal_array` and `mutually_orthogonal_latin_squares`). It is hard
 for me to tell if those constructions overlap.
 - ''generalized Wilson constructions'' which build TD(k,n) from "smaller"
 ones
 - ''translations'', which is basically what this ticket is about

 Is that all? I would like this to be clear before thinking about what you
 did.

 Vincent

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16231#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to