#16288: Optimize
sage.sets.cartesian_product.CartesianProduct._cartesian_product_of_elements
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Nicolas M. Thiéry | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/nthiery/16288_optimize_sage_sets_cartesian_product_cartesianproduct__cartesian_product_of_elements|
b5ad803eeb1e72e8f276416e7267a351ac314ed2
Dependencies: #16269 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> Which it is up to some point: it's also about basic data structures
> for parents, elements, ...
Hmmmm... Well, it would help if we moved misc/bitset* misc/binary_* in
structure/ then.
> As shown above, it is
> `sage.sets.cartesian_product.CartesianProduct.Element`, with just the
> abstract class from categories plugged in.
>
> Which by the way it does not have an `__init__` of its own, so we
> could not really move the `tuple/len` checks down there.
You lost me `:-P`
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16288#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-trac+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-trac@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
