#15882: Implement a catalog for crystals
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: tscrim | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.2
Component: combinatorics | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: crystals catalog | Merged in:
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen, Anne
Report Upstream: N/A | Schilling
Branch: | Work issues:
0942e811bcf4deaf06a13462018ae6c27da8cd17| Commit:
Dependencies: #14275 #16027 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by nthiery):
* commit: 0942e811bcf4deaf06a13462018ae6c27da8cd17 =>
Comment:
Hi!
Sorry, I haven't been been following up on this ticket, so that's probably
too late. Anyway, just as a food for thought, I wanted to mention that I
was surprised at first to have
{{{
crystals.Letters
}}}
rather than
{{{
crystals.CrystalOfLetters
}}}
The latter is nicer if you want to do {{{from crystals import *}}}. But
maybe the point is that you don't want to do that and just always
{{{crystals....}}}, and then it's less redundant.
Let's see how this is done in the other catalogs. Hmm, we have
{{{graphs.ChvatalGraph}}}, but {{{groups.permutation.Dihedral}}}. Not
super consistent ...
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15882#comment:53>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
