#16296: Speed improvements for categories with axioms
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  SimonKing          |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  cython             |    Merged in:
  performance categories             |    Reviewers:
        Authors:                     |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  cfe01ae673e44590b478b282eb61e0c644dbe643
  u/SimonKing/ticket/16296           |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:  #10963, #15801,    |
  #16309                             |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by SimonKing):

 Here is another benchmark. Idea: We have a list of tuples of categories,
 with varying base rings. For each tuple, we form the join category, first
 with cold cache, then with warm cache.

 With #15801:
 {{{
 sage: L = [(Coalgebras(GF(q,'a')), Sets.Finite(), CommutativeRings(),
 SimplicialComplexes()) for q in prime_powers(2,50000)]
 sage: %time C = [Category.join(Cats) for Cats in L]
 CPU times: user 21.1 s, sys: 136 ms, total: 21.2 s
 Wall time: 21.2 s
 sage: %time C = [Category.join(Cats) for Cats in L]
 CPU times: user 230 ms, sys: 1 ms, total: 231 ms
 Wall time: 231 ms
 }}}

 With this branch:
 {{{
 sage: L = [(Coalgebras(GF(q,'a')), Sets.Finite(), CommutativeRings(),
 SimplicialComplexes()) for q in prime_powers(2,50000)]
 sage: %time C = [Category.join(Cats) for Cats in L]
 CPU times: user 18.7 s, sys: 172 ms, total: 18.9 s
 Wall time: 18.9 s
 sage: %time C = [Category.join(Cats) for Cats in L]
 CPU times: user 150 ms, sys: 0 ns, total: 150 ms
 Wall time: 162 ms
 }}}

 __Discussion of the benchmark__

 - I am still not sure if this is a good test. Yes, there is some
 category+axiom mangling involved, but other examples might provide more of
 it.
 - We have a speedup of 11% with cold cache.
 - We have a speedup of 34% with warm cache.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16296#comment:55>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to