#16295: Faster is_orthogonal_array
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.3
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
combinatorics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | b9f8b0388a8cd333bfaf4160896b09be5550896a
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/ncohen/16295 |
Dependencies: |
#16236 |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by leif):
Replying to [comment:33 brett]:
> Does this data show that it is faster to simply do the multiplications?
In general depends on your CPU and your (C) compiler. (And in conjunction
with Cython, the kind of code the latter generates, i.e., whether the C
compiler can "guess" what's meant or whether the code is to obfuscated.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16295#comment:34>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
