#15921: work around Maxima fpprintprec bug and other ARM-specific problems
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dimpase | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: calculus | Resolution:
Keywords: Maxima, | Merged in:
fpprintprec, ARM | Reviewers: Peter Bruin
Authors: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: Reported | Commit:
upstream. Developers acknowledge | b8fea1cb11554aff202cd669342136d5a4ea084c
bug. | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
u/pbruin/15921-arm_fixes |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:36 vbraun]:
> What is the upstream status for the Maxima fpprintprec bug? If there is
a fix then we should just go with upstream instead of increasing our
tolerances imho. Its not cool of maxima to print too many digits.
I reminded Robert Dodier about it recently, and he was going to have a
look this week. No further word from him yet.
>
> As for the eglibc issue, I'm in favor of increasing the tolerance there.
At the end of the day that seems to be a valid implementation choice as
for how to implement tgamma, and 2 ulp isn't the end of the world.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15921#comment:37>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
