#14801: Piecewise functions done right
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vbraun | Owner: burcin
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Volker Braun, | Reviewers:
Ralf Stephan | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: public/piecewise | 496128f8fad75a19945588139d887a5707a72214
Dependencies: #14800, #14780, | Stopgaps:
#9556, #13125, #14802, #16397 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
It looks like there is still no proper deprecation for the "old" piecewise
stuff. Given that there seems to be a significant amount of stuff that
that has (even if in an antiquated form that should be redone), perhaps a
potential solution would be to do a deprecation of `Piecewise` that leads
to the old version, but where `piecewise` is the new one? (Wait, I already
said this in comment:11.) I agree with Volker that `piecewise_real` is
probably too involved, but this is not so crucial a change that we
shouldn't follow normal deprecation policy, especially since apparently
people really do use the plotting and convolution/fourier stuff, buggy
though it is.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14801#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
