#16412: Update Sage FAQ
---------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: knsam | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+--------------------------
Comment (by knsam):
Replying to [comment:7 leif]:
Is your last comment in reference to my point (6)? If so, do you mean that
we should not have anything about common mistakes that people make when
coming to Sage anew? For example, the polynomial vs symbolic expression
has appeared on sage-support quite often!
While I agree with you that we should not add stuff that we should not add
things that would become obsolete quickly, I guess some of these points
appear so often that it is probably worth having some standard answers to
refer people to. Do you agree here?
-- Kannappan.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16412#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
