#16427: Explain the rationale for having both categories and a hierarchy of
Cython
abstract classes for Parents and Elements
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Nicolas M. Thiéry | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/nthiery/explain_the_rationale_for_having_both_categories_and_a_hierarchy_of_cython_abstract_classes_for_parents_and_elements|
Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by nthiery):
* branch: =>
u/nthiery/explain_the_rationale_for_having_both_categories_and_a_hierarchy_of_cython_abstract_classes_for_parents_and_elements
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16427#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
