#16391: Helper functions for OA constructions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen             |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_info
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  combinatorial      |   Resolution:
  designs                            |    Merged in:
       Keywords:                     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen      |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:  u/ncohen/16391     |  2090875de8a5d9a0301a85fc35e0e60a068de1ab
   Dependencies:  #16370             |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 Yo Vincent !

 I cannot claim that `OA_with_holes` will always output "optimal results",
 and I never did.

 I need those designs for constructions of OA that we cannot build at the
 moment, and I have no other way to produce them. What is the problem with
 seeing this function as

 1) When k<=3 we know that it exists
 2) When there is a `OA(k+1,n)` we know that it exists
 3) If everything else fails, see if you are lucky

 And you want me to remove feature 3), even though it does return helpful
 things. I never claimed that the results would not change, and what I know
 for sure is that the results WILL improve as we add new OA. It is true, I
 cannot prove that eventually feature 3) will never become less powerful.

 And so what ? Do I throw all my useful code away because of that ? I
 really have no other way to generate these designs.

 > The multiplicity of TD(k,1) you obtain must strongly depend on the way
 you did your construction

 We have no proof of that. And I did not claim the contrary, but we have no
 proof of that. For instance the proof that it always exists when k<=3 is
 the proof that any OA contains an independent set of size 3, which means
 that the result will always hold in this case.

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16391#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to