#16431: sync-build is broken
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vbraun             |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  build              |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Volker Braun       |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/vbraun/remove_sync_build         |  da331348d6fc29fab2c0c8840c3248249a1a58a6
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Description changed by vbraun:

Old description:

> `sage -sync-build` doesn't understand wildcards, so it deletes a bunch of
> correctly-installed `sage.symbolic` modules.
>
> Really, the whole concept is broken. We should at the very least record
> what is being installed instead of trying to guess it in sync-build. Even
> better, make it part of the build process (assuming it doesn't take much
> time).
>
> There is quite a lot of setup code, none of which is doctested. And,
> therefore, broken. As this ticket shows. I've started to move setup code
> into a `sage_setup` package that is installed with Sage and can be
> doctested in the usual manner.
>
> Also:
> * Having `SAGE_LIB` point to `SAGE_SRC` is actually never useful,
> removed.

New description:

 `sage -sync-build` doesn't understand wildcards, so it deletes a bunch of
 correctly-installed `sage.symbolic` modules.

 Really, the whole concept is broken. We should at the very least record
 what is being installed instead of trying to guess it in sync-build. Even
 better, make it part of the build process.

 There is quite a lot of setup code, none of which is doctested. And,
 therefore, broken. As this ticket shows. I've started to move setup code
 into a `sage_setup` package that is installed with Sage and can be
 doctested in the usual manner.

 Also:
 * Having `SAGE_LIB` point to `SAGE_SRC` is actually never useful, removed.

--

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16431#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to