#16436: is_real method should exist for elements of AA, ZZ, QQ
-------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: slabbe | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by tmonteil):
If, as i proposed on sage-devel we could have an overlay (say, `RR`) for
real fields, the syntax `CC(3) in RR` would be very readable. The only
problem with `CC(3) in RealField(2)` is about `NaN` and `+/-Infinity`, but
you should notice that the same problem exists with the current
`.is_real()` methods, so the solution is not clear either.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16436#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
