#16370: OA(k,n) strongly regular graphs
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.3
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: graph | Reviewers:
theory | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | e469bb5b23d7862b48082f1cba9fd946dd7dc406
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/ncohen/16370 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> You meant `intersection` has no meaning ? It depends on how you see the
blocks.
Nono. I meant that for me "Block" has no meaning there. "intersection" on
the other hand is just wrong. This graph is the intersection graph of a
TD, not the intersection graph of an OA whose rows are not even sets.
> If you consider them as subsets of {0,...,n-1}^k^ then it is the
intersection graph of the blocks.
I would be delighted to hear how you define such an operation, but let's
get this done first.
> > I can relabel an OA. The graphs will be isomorphic but different.
>
> Of course, I meant non-isomorphic.
I just finished the job for "different OA". If you want non-isomorphic OA
provide them.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16370#comment:39>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
