#16388: Specify the values of k,n in the exceptions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen             |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  positive_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  combinatorial      |   Resolution:
  designs                            |    Merged in:
       Keywords:                     |    Reviewers:  Vincent Delecroix
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen      |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:  u/ncohen/16388     |  79178b62b55c9d38b4ee015118e1cbc6acefb8f8
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 Yo !

 > The terminology is not understandable:

 I just sent you "Combinatorial Designs: Construction and Analysis" from
 Douglas Stinson which uses `(v,k,lambda)-BIBD`, `TD(k,n)` and `OA(k,n)`. I
 believed that the Handbook of Combinatorial Designs did the same but they
 actually write `BIBD(v,k,lambda)`. Their purpose was probably to unify
 notations, given that `(v,k,lambda)-BIBD` is a pretty common :

 http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~leonard/repeated11.pdf
 http://www.argilo.net/files/bibd.pdf

 You will also find other occurrences of this naming in the references of
 the Handbook.

 Othey guys say 2-(v,k,lambda) design.

 > - MOLS(n,k) but TD(k,n)
 > - (v,k,lambda)-BIBD but TD(v,k,lambda)

 Two remarks :
 - `MOLS(n,k)` does not appear in Sage's code
 - It is true that the constructor of MOLS takes first a k then an n as
 input. It is true that it can lead to mistakes, and perhaps we should
 change it.
 - If you insist on using BIBD(v,k,lambda) it can be done but it has to be
 a global change as some pages, eg
 http://sagemath.org/doc/reference/combinat/sage/combinat/designs/bibd.html
 already use this terminology. Same for PBD.

 > good luck for your future merges... (now you are used to it ;-P)

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16388#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to