#16332: Game Theory: Build capacity to calculate Shapley value of cooperative
games.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vinceknight | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: PLEASE CHANGE | Resolution:
Keywords: Game Theory, | Merged in:
Cooperative Games | Reviewers:
Authors: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 0fc261b44e0a56a8755e785adab754ddf57a086c
u/jcampbell/game_theory__build_capacity_to_calculate_shapley_value_of_cooperative_games_|
Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
I'll try to look at this later today for some initial comments.
----
I **really** like the idea you had [https://github.com/theref/sage-game-
theory/issues/19#issuecomment-45208259 here]:
> with normal form games, we might have a prebuilt Matching Pennies game
that the user could load,
Yes! Just like
{{{
sage: graphs.[tab]
graphs.Balaban10Cage
graphs.Balaban11Cage
graphs.BalancedTree
graphs.BarbellGraph
graphs.BidiakisCube
graphs.BiggsSmithGraph
graphs.BishopGraph
graphs.BrinkmannGraph
<snip>
sage: matroids.[tab]
matroids.AG matroids.Uniform
matroids.named_matroids
matroids.CompleteGraphic matroids.Wheel
matroids.PG matroids.Whirl
}}}
This would be awesome, a built-in library one could explore of basic
examples.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16332#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
