#16374: better two_squares, three_squares, four_squares for small input
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: number theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Vincent Delecroix | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vdelecroix/16374 | fdf90e6da61efa184245e5e7fb61c27f79bf0396
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Hllooooooooo !
I re-read this thing again and I think that it is good to go. I added a
small commit in public/16374 to replace `2^32` with `2^{32}` which
produced a bad output in the html doc.
If you have no objection to that you can set the ticket to
`positive_review` `:-P`
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16374#comment:40>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
