#9107: Nested class name mangling can be wrong in case of double nesting
------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: hivert | Owner: nthiery
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Simon King | Reviewers: Volker Braun, Florent Hivert
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: #12808 | Stopgaps:
------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:69 vbraun]:
> Just require enumitems, geez...
What exactly do you mean? Would it be sufficient to let Sage insert
`usepackage{enumitem}` (I have not heard about the plural, `enumitems`),
or will we also need to change the latex code emitted for nested classes?
And how?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/9107#comment:72>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
