#16500: New recursive constructions of Orthogonal Arrays
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/ncohen/16500 | 70f7046fea49d3ae47cfd3670a9c53f34791e462
Dependencies: #16499 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by vdelecroix):
* status: needs_review => needs_info
Comment:
Hum
{{{
sage: designs.orthogonal_array(None,5,t=3,existence=True)
1
sage: designs.orthogonal_array(None,5,t=3)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ValueError: undefined for k less than 2
}}}
Why do you allow `t=3` when `existence` is set to `True`?
Vincent
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16500#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
