#6089: [with patch, positive review] view command: don't always use jsMath
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jhpalmieri | Owner: jhpalmieri
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.0.2
Component: misc | Keywords:
Reviewer: | Author:
Merged: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment(by rbeezer):
Passes all tests (sage -testall) and documentation builds cleanly.
Works well as designed, and I'm getting much more sensible behavior
(fallbacks and error messages) when I simulate dvipng or convert missing.
The extra comments and rearrangements in the code make it easier to
understand what's happening.
I meant to say a while back that it makes sense to not work too hard on
the lists of objects - if you want a nice graphic of just a single object,
you can just view it all by itself. And then simple lists should/can
behave rationally.
Documentation looks real good, plus its great to see doctests getting very
close to 100%.
I applied #5975 on top of this, and then it works well for displaying any
graph.
Nice work!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6089#comment:18>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
