#16504: Fix the confusion in MILP.new_variable()
--------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: linear programming | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:9 tmonteil]:
> Since `integer, binary, real` are mutually exclusive, why not simply
have a `type` variable that takes one on the three values ?
Backwards compatibility. With my proposal, we would have full backwards
compatibility.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16504#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
