#16553: Clean IncidenceStructure
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vdelecroix         |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_info
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  combinatorial      |   Resolution:
  designs                            |    Merged in:
       Keywords:                     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen,     |  Work issues:
  Vincent Delecroix                  |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  6cc8889f344f5cefb72ed123190838b25487ce4e
         Branch:  public/16553       |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by vdelecroix):

 Hi Nathann,

 As I completely rewrote the infrastructure it does not make much sense to
 have separated commits. I decided to implement a `t_design_parameters` (as
 a cached method) and a `is_t_design`. It is much more readable that way.

 I am not sure what to do with the caching of degrees... for sure we do not
 want to do it on startup. And for now, as the datastructure is still in
 basic state I vote for keeping it the way it is. If we will cache it in
 the future then we should remove the `@cached_method` on
 `t_design_parameters`.

 Neeeeeds review!

 Vincent

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16553#comment:31>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to