#16503: q-x construction of Orthogonal Arrays
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers: Vincent Delecroix
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/ncohen/16503 | 91eb3d2d16fa8a4576d6b5d6e2686af6f8593def
Dependencies: #16500 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by vdelecroix):
* status: needs_info => positive_review
* reviewer: => Vincent Delecroix
Comment:
Replying to [comment:11 ncohen]:
> HMmmmm... I don't like much to differentiate over integer divisions.. Do
you mind if we keep it like that ?
Me neither, but the floor function is increasing... so it is fine (as the
composition of increasing functions is increasing)! But we can keep it as
it is, since we cut very little with that: `(q^2-n)/(q-2) ~ q + cte` for
large `q`.
Vincent
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16503#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
