#16553: Clean IncidenceStructure
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vdelecroix         |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  combinatorial      |   Resolution:
  designs                            |    Merged in:
       Keywords:                     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen,     |  Work issues:
  Vincent Delecroix                  |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  9be78f42a2e26008661462f6db66b5646849ee76
         Branch:  public/16553v2     |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 Also, I wonder if it is a good idea to store the "labelled blocks" or if
 we should work with blocks on `0,...,n-1` and have dictionary to translate
 stuff when needed.. `O_o`

 I have been bitten once or twice by the time it took to hash vertex labels
 in graphs `-_-`

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16553#comment:96>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to