#16553: Clean IncidenceStructure
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen, | Work issues:
Vincent Delecroix | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | 9be78f42a2e26008661462f6db66b5646849ee76
Branch: public/16553v2 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Also, I wonder if it is a good idea to store the "labelled blocks" or if
we should work with blocks on `0,...,n-1` and have dictionary to translate
stuff when needed.. `O_o`
I have been bitten once or twice by the time it took to hash vertex labels
in graphs `-_-`
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16553#comment:96>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.