#16604: new OA for n=112,160,224,514,640,796
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/ncohen/16604 | 00654fb8dbffe2134dc0b55ead5cea52dadf1654
Dependencies: #16582 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by ncohen):
* status: needs_work => needs_review
Comment:
Yo !
> In `OA_14_124`, it is not safe to ask for a finite field of size 2^5^
and hope that, by chance, its generator satisfies `w^5 + w^2 + 1 = 0`.
Yeah... And "by chance" it always works ?
Given that you are the one to complain about this, I will use the first's
trick against you : {{{conway=True}}} `:-P`
> and I got a docbuild error
> {{{
> OSError: [combinat ] None:5: WARNING: citation not found: BvR514
> }}}
Ahahahah. I must have replaced 82 with 514 at some point `:-D`
I had also "made a small mistake" in the implementation. I had forgotten
to set some flag from "False" to "True", which means that the new OA have
a longer width. I didn't like to notice that I had implemented so many new
OA and that they did not even reach the Handbook's bound.... Now all is
good `:-P`
I also added an OA for 640, freshly debugged.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16604#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
