#16581: Added tides based desolvers
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mmarco | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: numerical | Resolution:
Keywords: sd59 | Merged in:
Authors: Miguel Marco | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/mmarco/ticket/16581 | 8b12bac74d036ab7546c63f9a8de2b8d0ef0f9e0
Dependencies: #16578, #16579 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vbraun):
You should use the CC / CFLAGS / LDFLAGS environment variables (CXX for
C++).
IMHO the integration is a bit underwhelming. Its ok for an optional
package, I guess. But better solutions would be
* Use the `cython()` command to dynamically generate a function that is
callable from Python, without parsing strings anywhere. Leaks a bit of
memory from the imports.
* Use `fast_callable(..., domain=RealField(prec))` to dynamically
construct the expression tree and only have a single Cython class that can
call tides as appropriate.
Do you have any plans in that direction?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16581#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
