#16158: Make Spec into a functor
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: pbruin | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: algebraic | Resolution:
geometry | Merged in:
Keywords: Spec functor | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
affine scheme | Work issues:
Authors: Peter Bruin | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | 185b49cd73907d2214401f96058e61b0eb334d8e
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/pbruin/16158-Spec_functor |
Dependencies: #15990, #16156 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by pbruin):
Replying to [comment:16 tscrim]:
> Well then for dependencies, should we then have #11474 and #16680?
It seems to me that this ticket actually has nothing to do with the
problem Volker found; it is #11474 that should have had #16680 as a
dependency if it hadn't been closed already. Would you agree with setting
this one back to positive review and finishing #16680 before the next
beta?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16158#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
