#15560: Add methods to rigged configurations
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: tscrim | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: rigged | Merged in:
configurations | Reviewers: Anne Schilling
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | a985081eb8bb47abb8e78546eaf7aa4638eddc77
public/combinat/rigged_configurations/methods-15560| Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #13872 #15882 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
Replying to [comment:25 aschilling]:
> There is a ` missing in
> ...
Ah, I forgot about the right split for KR tableaux. :P Fixed.
> Under `\bar \Phi` the map `\star` (which I guess is what you call
lusztig_involution) intertwines with `\theta`. It would be good to add a
check like that.
I've added a doctest.
> Even though it is stated in the documentation, that `build_graph` is an
optional
> parameter, it does not seem to take this input:
> {{{
> sage: rc = RC(partition_list=[[1],[1],[1],[1]])
> sage:
rc.to_tensor_product_of_kirillov_reshetikhin_crystals(build_graph=True)
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> TypeError Traceback (most recent call
last)
> <ipython-input-8-702cb808a701> in <module>()
> ----> 1
rc.to_tensor_product_of_kirillov_reshetikhin_crystals(build_graph=True)
>
> TypeError: to_tensor_product_of_kirillov_reshetikhin_crystals() got an
unexpected keyword argument 'build_graph'
> }}}
This is because this was not a parameter in
`to_tensor_product_of_kirillov_reshetikhin_crystals`, but in `*_tableaux`.
I've also added the parameter (and doc/test) to the 'to TP of KR crystals'
methods.
> What is the difference between `build_graph` and `display_steps`?
The first one constructs and returns the graph, the latter outputs each
step to the terminal. I've changed `output` to `print` to avoid some
ambiguity.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15560#comment:28>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
