#16490: Create a linear programming backend for cvxopt
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ingolfured | Owner: ingolfured
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: linear | Resolution:
programming | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers: Dima Pasechnik
Authors: Ingólfur | Work issues:
Eðvarðsson | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | f123734477134dcc85a2ce797a901fa191ac238f
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/ingolfured/create_a_linear_programming_backend_for_cvxopt|
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:47 vbraun]:
> You should probably use `# abs tol 1e-16` or so:
> {{{
> sage -t --long src/sage/numerical/backends/cvxopt_backend.pyx
> **********************************************************************
> File "src/sage/numerical/backends/cvxopt_backend.pyx", line 448, in
sage.numerical.backends.cvxopt_backend.CVXOPTBackend.solve
> Failed example:
> round(p.solve(), 2)
> Expected:
> pcost dcost gap pres dres k/t
> 0: -7.3165e+00 -2.3038e+01 6e+00 0e+00 2e+00 1e+00
> ...
> 8.8
> Got:
> pcost dcost gap pres dres k/t
> 0: -7.3165e+00 -2.3038e+01 6e+00 5e-17 2e+00 1e+00
> }}}
yeah, this line in the doctest
{{{
0: -7.3165e+00 -2.3038e+01 6e+00 0e+00 2e+00 1e+00
}}}
should be removed, as it is just output of the log of the convergence
towards a solution, nothing important.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16490#comment:48>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
