#16711: Upgrade R to version 3.1.1
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  charpent           |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  minor              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  packages:          |   Resolution:
  standard                           |    Merged in:
       Keywords:  r-project          |    Reviewers:  Nathann Cohen
        Authors:  Emmanuel           |  Work issues:
  Charpentier, Nathan Cohen          |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  9259e536e801aaa3544aa1466e624ce3aa327f34
         Branch:                     |     Stopgaps:
  u/charpent/upgrade_r_to_version_3_1_1|
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Emmanuel Charpentier, Nathan Cohen', 'oldvalue': 
u'Emmanuel Chatpentier'}):

 * author:  Emmanuel Chatpentier => Emmanuel Charpentier, Nathan Cohen


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:3 ncohen]:

 Dear Nathan,

 > Hellooooooooooo !
 >
 > I added a commit to your branch on public/16711. It adds a couple of
 line to spkg-src so that it is (even) easier to update this spkg. If you
 agree with it

 I can't : this has deep interferences with the Sage build system, which I
 do not undetstand yet. See Trac#16629 for a related problem : the length
 of exchanges with Volker Braun (which '''does''' understand the build
 system) proves that I do not understand the problem (except possibly on a
 set of null measure...:-).

 Furthermore, this fixes a problem '''different''' of the original one.
 This kind of ticket hijacking is likely to delay the solution of both
 hijacker and hijacked issues. Would you cate to take a look at #16629 and
 give us ypur advice ? BTW, this ticket still awaits review...

 > you can set this ticket to `positive_review` `:-)`

 I can't either : I am the author, and the whole point of a systematic peer
 review is to avoid too-hasty incorporation of
 incomplete/foolhardy/misguided patches. Saved my ass a couple of times
 already...

 On the other hand, '''you''' can give it positive review if you think that
 the branch fixes the specific problem the ticket was aimed at ;-) Ditto
 for #16629, BTW...

 HTH,

 Emmanuel Charpentier

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16711#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to