#16671: implement harmonic number function H(n,m)
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: rws | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: special, log | Merged in:
Authors: Ralf Stephan | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/rws/implement_harmonic_number_function_h_n_m_|
ebc93ecacf652b5b83077ba20c22b37f8178ca78
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nbruin):
By the way, what's your most convincing argument to use an argument order
opposite to that of maxima? I think your ordering agrees with what maple
and mathematica have chosen, so it may well be that that is indeed the
ordering that has most consensus. The wikipedia page is ambiguous since it
lists `H_{n,m}=H_n^m=H_m(n)`. Referencing explicitly which convention we
follow will make for a better motivated and more stable interface.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16671#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
