#12375: submit a giac  spkg
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  frederichan        |        Owner:  tbd
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  minor              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  packages:          |   Resolution:
  optional                           |    Merged in:
       Keywords:  giac               |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Han Frederic       |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:  public/giac_spkg   |  9562050fcc8774cbfeeaa88479cd8eb5733a45a7
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by dimpase):

 Replying to [comment:46 frederichan]:
 > Yes I can reproduce all these diffs outside sage so it is not a problem
 of the spkg. For the loss in precision I have reported it on xcas forum to
 know if it is a long term change or a bug so I wait a little to know if it
 should be changed in giac.py.

 you can just set up higher tolerance in the corresponding doctests.

 >
 > But I have also looked at the cython interface and I found a problem
 that I didn't have with sage 5.11.
 >
 > in the .pyx module I did:
 >
 > {{{
 > cdef extern from "csage/interrupt.h":
 >     void setup_sage_signal_handler "setup_sage_signal_handler"()
 > setup_sage_signal_handler()
 > }}}
 > and it worked fine with sage 5.11. But with my sage 6.2, even if I do
 this in an empty module tutu.pyx, then after doing in sage:
 >
 > {{{
 > import tutu
 > }}}
 > hitting a control-c in the prompt quits sage. Is there some way to set
 the good signal handler for interruptions?

 did you check in
 http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/coding_in_cython.html#interrupt-and-
 signal-handling

 It could be that things got changed there since 5.11 (I don't know for
 sure; ask on sage-develop if problems persist here). Do you do `sign_on`
 and `sign_off`  ?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12375#comment:47>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to