#16256: Reorganize the documentation indexes into src/sage/combinat
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery            |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_info
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  documentation      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  combinatorics,     |    Merged in:
  thematic index, quickref           |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Nicolas M. ThiƩry  |  Work issues:  gather comments by
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  showing it around, and work on the
         Branch:                     |  listed TODO's
  u/nthiery/reorganize_the_documentation_indexes_into_src_sage_combinat|       
Commit:
   Dependencies:  #16058             |  a23c12fafb58d03e371d47102bc490a7142ab7ab
                                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Replying to [comment:17 ncohen]:
 > If I understand correctly what this ticket is about, it rather goes
 > against your goal, as it means to add more files to the
 > documentation ...

 Indeed, as a side effect, it adds a few files that were missing from
 the reference manual; but this should not make a real difference.

 > On the bright side, this ticket intends to do so many things
 > requiring the input of so many persons that you can safely assume it
 > will ... take time before anything is done `:-P`

 Be my guest and show the example by doing your share :-)

 The produced documentation for the sections about graphs and designs
 with this branched applied can be found respectively in:

 -
 
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/nthiery/sage/src/doc/output/html/en/reference/combinat/index.html
 -
 
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/nthiery/sage/src/doc/output/html/en/reference/combinat/sage/combinat/designs/__init__.html

 The sources are in the corresponding `__init__.py` files:

 -
 http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/nthiery/sage/src/sage/combinat/__init__.py
 -
 
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/nthiery/sage/src/sage/combinat/designs/__init__.py

 (or just clone this branch as usual)

 What's to be done:

 - Checking that it looks good from the user point of view
 - Choosing better entry points when appropriate
   (e.g. sometime it's more natural to point directly to a class than
   to the module defining it).
 - Checking that it looks natural from the dev point of view
 - Checking that nothing got lost in the operation
 - Proofreading for typos

 Thanks in advance,
                         Nicolas

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16256#comment:27>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to