#16884: Quasi-difference matrices (database+is_QDM)
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen             |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_info
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  combinatorial      |   Resolution:
  designs                            |    Merged in:
       Keywords:                     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen      |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:  public/16884       |  f0b7bab049e078a663702a935ea5f09facd396ed
   Dependencies:  #16879             |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 Yo !

 > You mean a value I gues. As the code is

 Indeed. And I may do the same for 'mu' in the future too. This variable is
 mostly useless.

 > You can also set the values by hand (but still try hard to find more
 values).

 I began to write something which may more or less work. But today I had to
 clean the house in which I spent the week, tomorrow will be filled with
 travelling and sunday too. Adventure `:-P`

 > 3) When there does exist a good `QDM` to build an `OA(k,n)`, could we
 use `_OA_cache_set(kk,n,True)` instead of `_OA_cache_set(k,n,True)`. We
 will win some few calls (especially when running `MOLS_table`).

 I don't understand your sentence `O_o`

 > 4) I wonder if such things as 3) above is doable with
 `difference_matrix` as well. For example we could put a call to
 `_OA_cache_set` inside `difference_matrix` to set the existence to a
 potentially bigger `k`. Alternatively, one can write
 `_OA_cache_set(n,difference_matrix(n,None,existence=True))` in the core of
 `orthogonal_array` but it might be slower.

 Hmmmm.. I prefer that only the OA constructor plays with the `OA_cache`. I
 thought once or twice while coding that it was a good thing but I forgot
 why.

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16884#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to