#12922: Implicit derivative
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mmarco | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: calculus | Resolution:
Keywords: implicit | Merged in:
derivative | Reviewers: Kannappan Sampath
Authors: Miguel Marco | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 3f3f949cff46cc4e2f5b93bcf41de4c3f81f13cd
u/mmarco/ticket/12922 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by rws):
Replying to [comment:13 mmarco]:
> As i said, the reason why it is not a method is that it is not clear to
me what class should it be in.
>
> Is this a method of the expression F? Well, not exactly, since F is not
the function that we are trying to differentiate, but the symbollic
expression that deffines it implicitly.
I think Burcin wants this method part of the symbolic expression or
function class. If it's not tied to a specific expression then make it a
`@classmethod` (equivalent to a static method in C), and then create the
globally accessible name for it.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12922#comment:27>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
