#16930: Deprecate non-polynomial modulus argument in constructor of
implementations
of finite fields
----------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: finite rings | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: #16927, #8373 | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------+------------------------
Description changed by jdemeyer:
Old description:
> The "modulus" parameter for finite fields is handled by the fancy new
> `src/sage/rings/finite_rings/constructor.py` and the implementations of
> finite fields should only take a polynomial as modulus.
New description:
The "modulus" parameter for finite fields is handled by the fancy new
`src/sage/rings/finite_rings/constructor.py` and the implementations of
finite fields should only take a polynomial as modulus.
Also improve creating prime finite fields with the non-default
implementation.
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16930#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
