#16256: Reorganize the documentation indexes into src/sage/combinat
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: combinatorics, | Merged in:
thematic index, quickref | Reviewers:
Authors: Nicolas M. Thiéry | Work issues: Fix sphinx issues.
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 2252c4453b5788a3c44fe05100fc0a9f93ea6919
u/nthiery/reorganize_the_documentation_indexes_into_src_sage_combinat|
Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #16058 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:51 aschilling]:
> That is surprising given some of the syntax
> ...
> Perhaps I am looking at an old version of the compiled documentation,
but on
>
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/nthiery/sage/src/doc/output/html/en/reference/combinat/sage/combinat/crystals/__init__.html
#sage-combinat-crystals
> they are still there.
> ... various broken links ...
Sorry, I screwed up the rsync. Ok, now it's scripted, so that I don't
screw up again next time.
> Unlike stated on the catalogue site, the documentation does not
completely duplicate the documentation in sage.combinat.crystals.crystals.
I suggest moving it to sage.combinat.crystals.crystals.
> Sure.
Ok, will do! When I find the time ...
> For me that link is still broken. I am confused (since you say it is
supposed to be the link to the thematic tutorial): That link appear two
lines below that under
> "The Lie Methods and Related Combinatorics thematic tutorial"
> Why have two links to the thematic tutorial?
The first points to the introduction in
sage.combinat.crystals.crystals, the second one to the thematic
tutorial.
> That is very confusing to the user and developer since it says
> explicitly "alphabetical". From just looking at the list, it is not
> clear that the modules are listed alphabetical. Please include the
> name of the module or not flatten the list.
Hmm, more sphinx to do ...
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16256#comment:52>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
