#16340: Infrastructure for modelling full subcategories
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: full | Merged in:
subcategories, homset | Reviewers: Darij Grinberg,
Authors: Nicolas M. Thiéry | Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/categories/full_subcategories-16340|
d4c7a88563a397291b6cd5ddadb8f574cc1eedb5
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by tscrim):
* reviewer: => Darij Grinberg, Travis Scrimshaw
* work_issues: find good names =>
Comment:
I made some other categories into non-structure categories. This made me
wonder if we actually want the default category be a structure category.
Yet I don't think we have enough data currently to answer this right now.
I'm going to double-check to make sure I didn't miss any others and I'd
appreciate if someone else could do the same. Otherwise I think we're okay
to positive review it.
Darij, I've added you as a reviewer since you did look over the code and
give suggestions.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16340#comment:29>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
