#16813: symbolic Legendre / associated Legendre functions / polynomials
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: rws | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/rws/symbolic_legendre___associated_legendre_functions___polynomials|
0f86b77a9aa818add6848cacf9a3f371d49c7d3a
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by rws):
However, this will yield the same result unless the `log` has `conjugate`
associated with it. This shows your recurrence is actually correct but
numerical results derived from it by substitution may need a warning about
the log branch. I know not enough about calculus, maybe I'll ask again,
this time on sage-devel, if there should be a switch for `log()` to select
the branch in case of numerical evaluation. What do you think?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16813#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
