#16985: Poset: Faster is_selfdual()
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-wishlist
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/poset__faster_is_dual__|
17f1b0f71b8cb537bbe0a1dbdf7d350c0dd845b6
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jmantysalo):
Timings depend on test set. But with all 7-element posets this seems to be
about 10-times faster. On the other hand, when testing with 7-element
posets that really are duals this runs about 10% slower.
How should this kind of codes be tested, what kind of random posets to
use?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16985#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
