#16127: Fix comparison of PARI objects
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  pbruin             |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  new
       Priority:  critical           |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  interfaces         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  pari comparison    |    Merged in:
        Authors:                     |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/pbruin/16127-gcmp                |  9f3f4ea5223abfcedd5aae984129d4f27f68e1d0
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by pbruin):

 * cc: jdemeyer (added)
 * priority:  minor => critical
 * branch:   => u/pbruin/16127-gcmp
 * commit:   => 9f3f4ea5223abfcedd5aae984129d4f27f68e1d0


Old description:

> The following PARI series and ''p''-adics are incorrectly considered to
> be non-zero by `==` and `!=`:
> {{{
> sage: a = pari('O(x)'); a, a.type()
> (O(x), 't_SER')
> sage: b = pari('O(2)'); b, b.type()
> (O(2), 't_PADIC')
> sage: a.gequal(0)
> True
> sage: b.gequal(0)
> True
> sage: a == 0
> False  # should be True
> sage: b == 0
> False  # should be True
> }}}
> This is due to `__cmp__()` calling the function `gcmp_sage()` in
> `sage/libs/pari/misc.h` (custom replacement for PARI's `gcmp()`), which
> uses string comparison for non-real types.  The `gen` type does not
> implement `__eq__()`, `__lt__()` etc.; we either have to implement these,
> or we have to extend `gcmp_sage()` to use `gequal()` before resorting to
> string comparison.

New description:

 Comparison of PARI rationals is seriously broken:
 {{{
 sage: pari(1/2) < pari(1/3)
 True
 sage: pari(1) < pari(1/2)
 True
 }}}
 Furthermore,the following PARI series and ''p''-adics are incorrectly
 considered to be non-zero by `==` and `!=`:
 {{{
 sage: a = pari('O(x)'); a, a.type()
 (O(x), 't_SER')
 sage: b = pari('O(2)'); b, b.type()
 (O(2), 't_PADIC')
 sage: a.gequal(0)
 True
 sage: b.gequal(0)
 True
 sage: a == 0
 False  # should be True
 sage: b == 0
 False  # should be True
 }}}
 These bugs are caused by `__cmp__()` calling the function `gcmp_sage()` in
 `sage/libs/pari/misc.h` (custom replacement for PARI's `gcmp()`), which
 uses string comparison for all types other than `t_INT` and `t_REAL`.

 A possible solution is to implement `gen._richcmp_c_impl()` and to fix
 `gen._cmp_c_impl()` to use the standard PARI `gcmp()` instead of
 `gcmp_sage()`.  This requires catching PARI "forbidden comparison" errors.
 There is actually a non-negligible speed-up if no such error occurs, but a
 substantial penalty if an error does occur.

--

Comment:

 The attached branch is just a first attempt; it needs documentation, and
 we have to time some important comparisons and make sure that there is no
 significant speed penalty in realistic use scenarios.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16127#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to