#17009: Unbound local in sageinspect
------------------------------+----------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Simon King | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
------------------------------+----------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Simon King', 'oldvalue': ''}):
* status: new => needs_review
* author: => Simon King
Comment:
Fixed! There is some `if ... else` clause in `sage_getargspec`, simplified
as follows:
{{{
#!python
if cond1:
try:
return answer1
except AttributeError:
pass
elif cond2:
return answer2 or define func_obj
else:
return answer3 or define func_obj
do something with func_obj
}}}
So, the obvious problem is that upon catching the error, we want to do
something with `func_obj` but haven't defined it. Solution: Replace `elif`
by `if`. Test is added, needs review...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17009#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
