#17023: Adding width() function to poset
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-wishlist
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17023 | 99f8ed04511d4422eb0874a5332132b4058d8e34
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jmantysalo):
You are right, on average connected posets are far more common than non-
connected. Hence this should be like it now is.
Duh, should I try to understand theorem and read the code...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17023#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
