#16340: Infrastructure for modelling full subcategories
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery            |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  full               |    Merged in:
  subcategories, homset              |    Reviewers:  Darij Grinberg,
        Authors:  Nicolas M. ThiƩry  |  Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/categories/full_subcategories-16340|  
60aa128d42ee140fb268423a924fd0e80aab7329
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by pbruin):

 Replying to [comment:50 tscrim]:

 > I'm okay with the default for axioms not being structure categories.
 However I'd rather have fuctorial construction categories being structure
 categories by default (I believe currently we only have two, graded and
 with-realizations, but the two I'd like to add, topological and metric,
 have additional structure).

 It may be because I'm still misled by the terminology, but I'm afraid this
 only increases my confusion about what functorial construction categories
 are.  In what sense do "topological" and "metric" have something to do
 with modelling codomains of a collection of functors?  (Of course
 topological/metric spaces can be domains/codomains of functors, but I
 don't think this is what Nicolas meant in comment:49).

 To me "topological" and "metric" are examples of "extra structure", in the
 sense that there are canonical functors (metric spaces) -> (topological
 spaces) -> (sets).  In the current Sage implementation/parlance, I guess
 they would be regarded as examples of axioms.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16340#comment:52>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to